Skip to content
SkillsValidator
Get started

Employee skills assessment for growth and internal mobility

SkillsValidator helps L&D and operations leads check what employees can do through role-specific work and explanations of their own decisions. Use the evidence to discuss promotion readiness, internal certification, development priorities, and moves between teams. Each Skills Report connects the evaluation to an explicit rubric, giving managers and employees a concrete starting point.

Get started See pricing

Evaluate readiness through work that matches the opportunity

Employee skills assessment gives development conversations a shared basis in observable work. Build a validation for the responsibilities an employee needs to perform, then review the submission and explain-back answers together. The report shows demonstrated skills and evidence that needs further verification, supporting a focused discussion about readiness and development.

For a promotion, assess the work expected at the next level rather than treating strong performance in the current role as proof of every future responsibility. For internal mobility, define the destination role's requirements. For internal certification, establish the skills and rubric your organization uses to recognize proficiency.

  • Promotion reviews focus on evidence relevant to the expanded responsibilities.

  • Internal mobility reviews connect transferable skills with the destination role.

  • Internal certification checks your organization's defined requirements.

  • Development planning identifies what needs practice or additional evidence.

These reports support your internal process. They do not confer an external professional credential or replace a required licensing assessment.

Use skill gap analysis tools with evidence behind each gap

Skill gap analysis tools become more useful when each gap points to observable evidence. SkillsValidator reports give you per-skill scores, quoted work, and rubric lines that you can bring into a team skills matrix. Compare demonstrated capability with role requirements while keeping missing evidence separate from a confirmed development need.

Build the matrix from reports using shared skill definitions and comparable rubrics. Put the skills required for the work alongside each employee's evidence and review status. CSV exports help you bring report results into your existing planning process. The matrix is something your team assembles from evidence, rather than a claim inferred from job titles.

  • Define a common skill consistently before comparing employees.
  • Keep the role and seniority context attached to the result.
  • Mark not shown as missing evidence that may need follow-up.
  • Use the supporting work to identify a relevant learning activity.

Explore the reporting and export options in our skills assessment software.

Customer issue resolution

Strong

Rubric

Acknowledges the customer's concern without blaming them

"I understand why this looks like a duplicate charge."

1 / 1

Separates a pending authorization from a settled charge

"The first entry is settled; the second is a pending authorization."

1 / 1

Checks the billing record before promising a remedy

"I checked the invoice and payment history."

1 / 1

Gives a specific next action without guaranteeing a bank outcome

"If both entries settle, reply here and I will escalate the duplicate payment for review."

1 / 1

Build a check around the skill you need to develop

Enter the role, skills, seniority, and validation style to draft a rubric per skill and 3 to 6 tasks in minutes. Review and edit the draft before inviting employees. Choose Work sample, Scenario decisions, or Code task according to the kind of evidence the responsibility actually requires.

A training completion record shows participation. A relevant work sample shows how an employee applies the learning. Ask employees to explain their own decisions so that a polished deliverable does not stand alone as evidence. Keep the task focused on the skill rather than unrelated familiarity with a particular exercise.

See skills validation for the full workflow and the technical assessment platform for engineering development checks.

Worked example

Check an operations employee's readiness for escalation work

Consider an operations employee seeking a role that handles exceptions. A relevant validation asks the employee to review a disputed request, identify missing information, and choose an escalation path. Explain-back questions then ask why that path fits the policy and how the decision changes when a key assumption changes.

The manager defines the rubric before the employee begins. Relevant criteria might include distinguishing facts from assumptions, applying the policy, and communicating the next step. The submission provides the work to inspect, while the explanation shows whether the employee understands the decision or simply reaches a plausible answer.

If the evidence demonstrates policy reasoning but does not show clear escalation communication, the development conversation can focus on that skill. The manager can agree on relevant practice and review fresh evidence afterward.

Turn the Skills Report into a specific development conversation

The Skills Report shows a score per skill, quoted evidence, and the rubric line by line. Recommendation bands labeled strong, verify, and not shown help managers organize follow-up. Use the underlying work to discuss what the employee demonstrates, what remains uncertain, and which next activity would produce useful evidence.

Share the report PDF to keep the discussion connected to the work. Interpret bands in the role's context and document the reasons for your decision.

Keep development evaluation consistent and open to context

Job-related tasks and shared rubrics support consistent, documented evaluation, while integrity signals identify concerns for human review. Every flag receives human review and never triggers automatic rejection. Employers remain responsible for accommodations, interpretation, and employment decisions. SkillsValidator does not certify legal compliance or guarantee a particular employment outcome.

Paste events, typing rhythm, time-on-task anomalies, and similarity to known AI output require context. Communicate permitted tools and timing before work begins. Employees should request accommodations through the employer before starting a timed task. Review relevant explanations rather than treating a process signal as proof of misconduct or inability.

Read about skills verification before defining your review process.

Frequently asked questions

[email protected]

Can this replace a manager's performance review

SkillsValidator contributes evidence about specific skills under defined task conditions. It does not replace the wider context of an employee's performance, collaboration, or responsibilities. Managers use the report alongside other relevant information and remain responsible for promotion, development, and internal mobility decisions, including explaining how the evidence informs those decisions.

How do we compare skills across different roles

Compare a skill only when the underlying definition, difficulty, and rubric are appropriate to both roles. Keep role-specific expectations visible in your matrix and avoid treating scores from different tasks as interchangeable. Use the report's quoted evidence and rubric lines to understand what each employee actually demonstrates in context.

Do employees pay or have to publish their results

The employer pays for the subscription, and employees never pay to complete a validation. People who pass can opt into a free, portable Verified Skills profile with their report. Participation is optional. Employers should explain their internal evaluation process separately from the employee's choice about keeping a portable profile.

Give your next development decision a clear evidence base

Create your account to build a validation around the responsibilities your employees need to demonstrate. Review the work and explain-back answers, then bring the evidence into your development conversation. Compare pre employment testing software plans to choose the capacity and team access that fit your organization's evaluation needs.

Get started